[8] The worst is the assumption of infinitely rigid endposts holding the taut string, so that no movement of these endposts occurs. This further assumes that no induced movement of the body of the instrument occurs. The end result is to eliminate all of that wave that is produced in the body of the instrument, and retain only the transverse wave produced in the string. In the first place, this standard procedure has now become a total violation of Newton's third law, which among other things requires that forces be formed in oppositional pairs. So the standard method for the launch of a wave from an instrument is flawed. Specifically, the "transverse string wave" is falsified insolaf as its appearance in the surrounding medium. This is not the wave that actually exits the instrument and that is launched into the medium. This universal oversight on the part of mathematicians and physicists is a colossal joke upon them. Literally, when a physicist writes the transverse wave equation on the board, he has just discarded exactly half the physics. This means that, in his interactions, at the end there will suddenly appear this mysterious, mystical "equal and opposite reaction force" that is created by the erroneously ignored antiwave. So he has to piously invoke this reaction force "from the blue." Yet quantum field theory teaches us already that all mechanical and electromagnetic forces on a mass are generated by absorption and emission of virtual photons. Hence Newton's third law reaction force must also be so generated. This means that there must exist an equal number of virtual antiphotons interacting in the antiforce, as there was virtual photons interacting in the causative force. By symmetry there must also exist an equal and opposite wave, or antiwave, made of these same antiphotons. The actual disturbance that entered from the vacuum must therefore have consisted of both wave and antiwave. QED.

---